Get Tokenomics

Tokenomics for economies where agents pay agents

Consulting for agent-to-agent economies and machine payments: token design, pricing of agent services, simulation and stress-testing. We are running the first pilot on our own product—Lasso—so the method is tested on our own money first.

40+
tokenomics projects
240+
patterns library
5
rails in the working stack

What we design

The same discipline as the rest of our practice—actors, flows, sinks, sources, incentives—applied to economies where some actors are software with budgets. Scoped and quoted per engagement.

Agent-economy token design

Token constructions for economies where agents transact: sinks and sources for machine actors, fee capture on agent flows, emission tied to verifiable agent work. From a design brief to a defensible construction with a model.

Machine-payment rail economics

The economics of x402 and AP2 rails, not just the plumbing: pay-per-request pricing, facilitator flow, USDC settlement without gas on the client, replay and authorization-race protection, agent wallet integration.

Agent service pricing & unit economics

What a machine actor will actually pay, and what your margin survives: per-task COGS, loop multipliers, price corridors for agent services, and where a token layer captures value—or provably does not.

Simulation and stress-testing

Cliff-unlock sell pressure, emission-to-revenue drift, mass-exit scenarios, Monte-Carlo and agent-based runs in cadCAD—the design goes through the engine before it goes to market.

Agent governance—with Blockful

Delegation to agents, quorum and anticapture design, voting security for economies where software votes. The governance blocks of this direction are built with our partner Blockful.

Launch support

From a stress-tested construction to a live economy: parameter handover, monitoring metrics, escalation thresholds, and a redesign loop when reality disagrees with the model.

Rails are ready. Demand is early. That is exactly when you design.

Over eighteen months a full agent-to-agent stack came together: MCP for context, Google's A2A for inter-agent interaction, x402 and AP2 for payments, agentic wallets, reputation on W3C DIDs. Nothing technical now stands between one agent and buying a service from another. Paying demand still trails the rails by orders of magnitude—and we say so on this page instead of selling you a boom. Economies designed now, before the flow arrives, are the ones that avoid the failure patterns we catalog.

How an engagement runs

Five steps, each ending in a written artefact you can challenge. The same process we are running on our own relaunch of Lasso.

?
01

Discovery

Which actors are human and which are machines, what flows between them, what decision hangs on the design. End state—a written brief both sides agree on.

ActorsFlowsBrief
TokenAlloc %VestingTeam15%24 moInvestors20%12 moCommunity40%36 moTreasury25%48 mo
03

Design and modeling

Token construction plus a financial model: sinks and sources for agent actors, fee capture on machine flows, emission against real revenue, pricing of agent services with unit economics per task.

Token designModelPricing
modelreportdeckdashboard
05

Launch and handover

Parameters, monitoring metrics and escalation thresholds handed over in writing. When the live economy disagrees with the model, the redesign loop is part of the engagement, not a new sales call.

HandoverMonitoringRedesign loop
sourcesnapshotinput
02

Actor & mechanism mapping

Stakeholders, agent roles, service catalog, payment paths. Every mechanism specified through actors, actions, parameters, dependencies and incentive exceptions—before any number is picked.

MechanismsDependenciesExceptions
basebull/bear
04

Stress-test

The design goes through simulation before it goes to market: cliff pressure, mass-exit events, emission-to-revenue drift, Monte-Carlo and agent-based runs. Findings feed back into the construction, not into a slide.

Monte-CarloABMScenarios

Want the productized version?

We also packaged this expertise into seven bounded tokenomics agents—$20–249 per completed order, waitlist open.

Where A2A tokenomics applies

Real mechanics from our patterns library, weighted toward what agent economies most often get wrong.

Agent launchpads

Bonding-curve launchesBuyback flywheelsGraduation thresholdsCreator revenue splitsaGDP metrics

Agent protocols & swarms

Revenue share on agent flowsFee captureStaking for service qualityAgent-to-agent settlementLoop-multiplier cost control

Machine-payment rails

x402 pay-per-requestAP2 mandatesFacilitator economicsReplay & authorization-race protectionGas sponsorship

Agent marketplaces

Service pricingReputation stakingSlashing for failed jobsDiscovery incentivesEscrowed jobs

DePIN & compute

Agent compute marketsProof-of-compute collateralWallet-funded inferenceWorkload-tied emission

Agent governance—with Blockful

Delegation to agentsQuorum & anticaptureVoting securityProposal spam resistance

Partners

The governance layer of the A2A direction is built with a partner, not improvised.

Blockful ↗

Governance research and engineering

Blockful builds governance infrastructure and security research for major DAOs. In the A2A track they own the governance blocks—delegation to agents, anticapture design, voting security—led by Zeugh (Ion Neto), Head of Research.

FAQ

What is A2A tokenomics?
Token design for economies where autonomous agents transact with each other: machine payments (x402, AP2), agent wallets, pricing of agent services, reputation, and governance. It is the same discipline as the rest of our work—actors, flows, sinks, sources, incentives—except some of the actors are software with budgets, which changes elasticities, attack surfaces, and what ‘demand’ even means.
Is there real A2A demand today?
Honest answer: the rails are far ahead of paying demand, and we publish the numbers rather than hide them. As of August 2026: 165M cumulative x402 transactions and ~69,000 active agents against roughly $28k of real daily flow across the whole ecosystem, with 76% of services charging ≤$0.10 per call. That is why this page sells design and verification—not a gold rush. Economies designed now, before the flow arrives, are the ones that avoid the failure patterns we catalog.
What is the Lasso pilot?
Lasso is our own product, being relaunched as an agent economy—and we are using it as engagement zero for this direction. Actor mapping, machine-payment rails, agent-service pricing, stress-tests: every step of the process above runs on our own project first. That is deliberate: the method gets tested on our own money before we charge yours.
Who does the governance work?
The governance blocks—delegation to agents, quorum and anticapture design, voting security—are built with our partner Blockful, a governance research and engineering firm working with major DAOs. Giants owns the economic design; Blockful owns governance security. One engagement, two specialized teams.
How does this relate to your other services?
A2A is a direction, not a replacement. The four tracks—Tokenomics Design, Modeling, Audit, Tokenization—stay as they are. A2A applies them to economies where agents transact: same method, new class of actors.
Do you also sell your own tokenomics agents?
Yes—that is a separate, productized offer: seven bounded tokenomics specialists with fixed inputs, fixed outputs and machine prices of $20–249 per completed order. It has its own page: Tokenomics Agents. This page is about consulting for your agent economy; that one is about buying artifacts from our agents.
Do you sign NDAs?
Yes, before any project material is shared. Standard mutual NDAs—we have a template, or we sign yours. Agent-economy material often includes unreleased product plans and pricing, so we treat it at the same sensitivity level as audit material.

Building an agent economy?

Send what exists—a deck, a service catalog, an early model, or just the idea. We will read it cold and come back with a focused proposal.